In re Ramp Chevrolet

Franchisor's reduction of debtor franchisee's wind-down payments was not a setoff and did not violate stay.
Procedural posture: 
Chapter 11 debtor filed a motion to hold a franchisor in contempt for willfully violating the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a)(7), by asserting improper setoffs under 11 U.S.C.S. § 553 without court approval, and for filing a secured proof of claim in the debtor's case in violation of the automatic stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ramp Chevrolet. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on December 21,2010, LexisNexis #0211-108