Dipasquale v. Cramer (In re Cramer)

Ruling: 
Settlement of claim based on debtor's admittedly false representations was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff creditors filed an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor, asserting that his debt was non-dischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) and seeking attorneys' fees and other costs. Third party defendant was the creditors' daughter, debtor's former wife. The matter was before the court for a consent order.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dipasquale v. Cramer (In re Cramer). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 16,2012, LexisNexis #0812-049