In re Rice

Ruling: 
Debtor who did not read schedules could not amend as failure to include exemptions was not unintentional.
Procedural posture: 
A Chapter 7 debtor filed an amended Schedule C in which he claimed an exemption for a cashier's check for retirement funds in the amount of $95,000 and for garnished retirement funds in the amount of $18,807 under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(d)(12). The trustee filed an objection to the debtor's amended claim of exemptions.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Rice. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 02,2011, LexisNexis #0811-116