Royal v. First Interstate Bank (In re Trierweiler)

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court properly held that defining the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems as mortgagee did not split note from mortgage to make it invalid or avoidable.
Procedural posture: 
Appellant trustee sought review of a decision from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Wyoming, in favor of appellees, a bank and the Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS), on his adversary complaint seeking to avoid under 11 U.S.C.S. § 544 the mortgage on the debtors' home.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Royal v. First Interstate Bank (In re Trierweiler). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 28,2012, LexisNexis #0113-087