Andresen & Arronte PLLC v. Hill (In re Hill)

Ruling: 
Dischargeability proceeding dismissed as to debtor's spouse against whom there was no evidence of fraud.
Procedural posture: 
Creditor, a law firm which represented defendant debtors in a prepetition state court lawsuit (debtors were also defendants there), brought an adversary proceeding against debtors pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2). At trial, debtors moved for directed verdict after the firm presented its case-in-chief. The court deferred a ruling on that motion until after debtors presented their case.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Andresen & Arronte PLLC v. Hill (In re Hill). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 23,2010, LexisNexis #0610-087