In re Warden

Claimed expenses for two older non-luxury vehicles were not grounds for denial of confirmation.
Procedural posture: 
The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of debtor's plan on the grounds that debtor failed to dedicate all projected disposable income to pay unsecured creditors as 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B) required.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Warden. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 23,2012, LexisNexis #0512-066