In re Lisenko

Confirmation denied due to unplanned discrepancy between disposable income calculated on Form 22C and not income on Schedule J.
Procedural posture: 
The chapter 13 Trustee objected to confirmation of the debtor's proposed plan under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325. At issue was whether the debtor was committing all of her "projected disposable income" under the plan as required by 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B) when her "monthly disposable income" as calculated on Official Bankr. Form 22C was approximately one-half the amount of her "monthly net income" reflected on Schedule J.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lisenko. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 24,2008, LexisNexis #0508-054