Hamilton v. Fisher (In re Fisher)

Ruling: 
Inconsistent statements as to residence did not amount to fraud that would defeat homestead exemption.
Procedural posture: 
Adversary plaintiff, the chapter 13 trustee, filed a complaint seeking revocation of defendant debtor's discharge, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1328(e), based upon debtor's allegedly fraudulent claimed homestead exemption of certain real property, pursuant to Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-2301.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hamilton v. Fisher (In re Fisher). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 22,2013, LexisNexis #0213-064