Baker v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon (In re Baker)

Debtor's unscheduled claims against lender not raised in prior foreclosure action were barred by Rooker-Feldman doctrine and collateral estoppel.
Whether claims that debtors filed against mortgage lender and mortgage servicer, alleging that defendants committed breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), and violated New Mexico's Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA), were barred.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Baker v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon (In re Baker). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 04,2013, LexisNexis #1113-006