Harmon Autoglass Intellectual Prop. LLC v. Leiferman (In re Leiferman)

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court did not err in striking debtor's answer in nondischargeability proceeding and entering default judgment of nondischargeability.
Procedural posture: 
Chapter 7 debtor sought review of an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, which struck his answer as a sanction for discovery abuses, entered a default judgment against him and in favor of appellee creditor in the amount of a judgment debt, and found that debt to be nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(B).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harmon Autoglass Intellectual Prop. LLC v. Leiferman (In re Leiferman). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 30,2010, LexisNexis #0710-016