In re Wiggs

Ruling: 
Objection to confirmation was sustained since plan did not provide for full payment of all unsecured debts.
Procedural posture: 
The matter was before the court on the motion to dismiss and objection to confirmation brought by the standing chapter 13 trustee. The matter involved debtors who owned two vehicles but did not incur expenses for payment of a note. The trustee objected to the ownership expense for two vehicles for which they had no loan or lease. Debtors relied upon 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b) and the case implicated 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A)(B).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wiggs. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member