In re Whitehead

Discharge denied due to unexplained loss of investment property.
Procedural posture: 
Creditor brought an adversary complaint against chapter 7 debtor objecting to discharge and/or the dischargeability of a debt, based on debtor's failure to satisfactorily explain the loss of an asset, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(5). Creditor and debtor had a business venture that involved purchasing and fixing up houses, and debtor had transferred one such house to his parents.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Whitehead. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 16,2012, LexisNexis #1112-026