Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto

Magistrate's recommendation that action against individual was subject to stay vacated upon notice of discharge.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff homeowner sued defendant insurer, surety, and other individuals, alleging fraud, misuse of a notary seal, alteration of a security instrument, and violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act. After one individual filed for bankruptcy, a magistrate judge recommended that the action be stayed as to him. Before an amended recommendation was referred to the district court, the homeowner moved for a stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hamel-Schwulst v. Negrotto. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 05,2009, LexisNexis #0909-042