Viegelahn v. Frost (In re Frost)

Proceeds of sale of debtor's exempt homestead reverted to the estate after expiration of state law exemption.
Did state homestead exemption that was permanent if property was retained but expired in sale proceeds after six months conflict with the Bankruptcy Code provision that once property is exempted under § 522(c) it is not liable for any debt during or after the case, except in the case of dismissal?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Viegelahn v. Frost (In re Frost). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2014, LexisNexis #0314-114