Ritchie Capital Mgmt. LLC v. Stoebner

Transfer of trademarks to corporate insider of debtor for which proceeds were diverted to Ponzi scheme rather than to debtor held to be fraudulent.
Did the bankruptcy court properly avoid the transfer of debtor Polaroid's trademarks, in exchange for loans, the proceeds of which were never received by debtor but rather by other companies similarly owned by Ponzi scheme operator Tom Petters?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ritchie Capital Mgmt. LLC v. Stoebner. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2015, LexisNexis #0415-054