Miller v. Hirn (In re Raymond)

Venue of preference proceeding was proper where debt was not consumer and transferee was an insider of debtor.
Procedural posture: 
In this adversary proceeding, plaintiff trustee sued to recover an alleged avoidable preference in the amount of $ 6,000. Defendant, who resided outside the Northern District of Georgia, moved to dismiss on the ground that venue was improper under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1409(b).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Miller v. Hirn (In re Raymond). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 16,2009, LexisNexis #0909-099