In re Warren

Confirmation denied where plan proposed payments for recreational boat not reasonably necessary to debtor's maintenance and support.
Did boat expense claimed by chapter 13 debtor unfairly reduce the debtor's disposable income to the detriment of the unsecured creditors for a "luxury item" not used in debtor's employment and not necessary for debtor's support or the support of debtor's dependents?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Warren. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 01,2015, LexisNexis #0615-136