Arlow v. F.A.Y. Props. (In re Mid-City Parking Inc.)

Pre 2005-Act: 
Pre 2005-Act
Transfers made per a validly assumed executory contract were not preferential.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff trustee filed an adversary complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550 against defendant lessor in connection with five transfers made to it by debtor parking lot operator that were claimed to be preferential within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 547. Three of the claims were resolved prior to trial, at which the court heard evidence on the remaining claims and on defendant's ordinary course of business defense under 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(2).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Arlow v. F.A.Y. Props. (In re Mid-City Parking Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on December 27,2007, LexisNexis #0208-026