Colonial Sur. Co. v. Weizman

Pre 2005-Act: 
Pre 2005-Act
Indemnity claims of surety that were not properly scheduled were not discharged.
Procedural posture: 
Surety company sued a construction company, an indemnitor, and other indemnitors, seeking reimbursement for expenses incurred by the surety company. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts rejected the indemnitor's bankruptcy discharge defense under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523 and found in favor of the surety company. The indemnitor appealed.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Colonial Sur. Co. v. Weizman. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 06,2009, LexisNexis #0609-099