Kapila v. Spiegel LLC (In re Fountainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC)

Ruling: 
Payments for work performed prior to preference period were not avoidable.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff trustee filed a complaint against defendant seeking to avoid and recover an alleged preferential transfer pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 547. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kapila v. Spiegel LLC (In re Fountainebleau Las Vegas Holdings LLC). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on April 12,2013, LexisNexis #0513-018