Durden Banking Co. v. McKinney (In re McKinney)

Discharge denied due to false testimony at §341 meeting and other omissions and misrepresentations.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff creditor filed a complaint against defendant debtors, a husband and wife, claiming that the debt the debtors owed was excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4) and § 523(a)(6), and that the debtors should be denied a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4)(A), (a)(4)(D), (a)(5), and (a)(7).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Durden Banking Co. v. McKinney (In re McKinney). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2012, LexisNexis #0512-092