In re McLain

Failure to step up payments after vehicle loans were paid off was not grounds for denial of confirmation.
Procedural posture: 
Debtors moved for confirmation of their proposed chapter 13 plan. The chapter 13 trustee and a creditor both filed objections to confirmation on the grounds that the proposed plan failed to devote all of the debtors'"projected disposable income" to be received in the "applicable commitment period"within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McLain. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 24,2007, LexisNexis #1107-123