ExpressDrop Inc. v. Mateyko (In re Mateyko)

Ruling: 
Settlement of action accusing debtor of theft of trade secrets and intellectual property was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture: 
Creditor filed this adversary complaint objecting to the discharge of a debt arising from an agreed judgment order in a state court action where the creditor accused defendant debtor of theft of trade secrets and intellectual property. After the settlement was entered, the debtor filed for relief under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The creditor filed this nondischargeability action under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(a)(A) and § 523(a)(6).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of ExpressDrop Inc. v. Mateyko (In re Mateyko). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 27,2010, LexisNexis #1010-088