In re Mascoll

Confirmation denied where plan did not specify payments and was filed primarily to forestall foreclosure sale.
Procedural posture: 
Chapter 13 trustee and two of the debtor's secured creditors objected to confirmation of the debtor's plan on the grounds that it failed to meet the requirements of confirmation set forth in 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mascoll. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2008, LexisNexis #0608-125