Puzzo v. Martin (In re Martin)

Debt was dischargeable absent showing that debtor contractor knew that representations regarding payment of subcontractors were false when made.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff homeowners brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor who performed construction work on the homeowners' residence seeking a determination that a debt to the homeowners was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a) based on the debtor's fraud, fiduciary defalcation, and willful and malicious injury. The debtor moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Puzzo v. Martin (In re Martin). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 03,2009, LexisNexis #0110-049