Bruner v. Armstrong (In re Armstrong)

Above-median debtors entitled to claim monthly vehicle expense on two cars, one of which was owned free and clear.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff trustee filed an action against defendant chapter 13 debtors, seeking review of a decision by the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington which confirmed a plan the debtors proposed for repaying their creditors. The trustee claimed that the plan should not have been confirmed because it did not require the debtors to commit all their disposable income to the plan, as required by 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bruner v. Armstrong (In re Armstrong). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 24,2008, LexisNexis #1108-084