In re Wilson

Ruling: 
Reaffirmation agreement could not be approved due to potential undue hardship to debtor.
Procedural posture: 
A bankruptcy debtor sought to reaffirm a debt to a creditor secured by the debtor's vehicle to allow the debtor to retain the vehicle. The debtor moved for approval of a reaffirmation agreement pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wilson. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 26,2012, LexisNexis #0712-084