In re St. Louis

Ruling: 
Order sustaining objection to proof of claim vacated due to improper service upon creditor.
Issue: 
Debtor's objection to creditor's proof of claim did not request the court to cancel or release liens, was not served upon lawyer who voted to accept the plan and did not attach a proposed form of order. Should the order sustaining the objection be vacated on reconsideration.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re St. Louis. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 21,2013, LexisNexis #0913-069