In re Soto

Ruling: 
Plan could not include language requiring periodic status reports by secured lenders.
Procedural posture: 
When a chapter 13 plan proposed by debtors, a married couple, included language requiring secured lenders, presumably including objector bank, to provide debtors with certain periodic information as to the status of the mortgage obligation, the lender objected. Issues included the relationship of the proposed language to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002.1 and whether 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(11) authorized inclusion of such a provision.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Soto. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 26,2013, LexisNexis #0213-099