In re Crawford

Ruling: 
Reaffirmation of lease that debtor had already assumed approved absent presumption of undue hardship.
Procedural posture: 
Debtor, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524, filed with the court an agreement reaffirming his obligation to a creditor from which debtor was leasing a vehicle. Debtor had previously assumed the lease pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 365(p). The court thereupon considered whether the agreement was subject to review under either § 524 or Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Crawford. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 19,2010, LexisNexis #0810-121