Shults & Tamm v. Brown (In re Hawaiian Telcom Communs. Inc.)

Postpetition severance payments to debtor's former employee were avoidable as agreement was not executory, was not assumed and payments were not made in ordinary course of business.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff litigation trustee filed an adversary proceeding against defendant, a former employee of the debtors, to recover allegedly avoidable transfers. The parties filed motions for summary judgment as to the count which sought to avoid postpetition severance payments to defendant under 11 U.S.C.S. § 549.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shults & Tamm v. Brown (In re Hawaiian Telcom Communs. Inc.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 30,2012, LexisNexis #0212-128