In re Keith

Ruling: 
Turnover of cashiers checks and surcharge of claimed exemption warranted due to nondisclosures in schedules.
Issue: 
Was turnover of cashier's checks held in debtor's safe deposit box and a surcharge of claimed exempt property warranted due to debtor's nondisclosures in schedules.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Keith. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 07,2014, LexisNexis #0114-117