Cote v. Catherman (In re Catherman)

Pre 2005-Act: 
Pre 2005-Act
Ruling: 
Creditor failed to establish that debtor intentionally misrepresented the purpose of a loan and thus loan debt was deemed dischargeable.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff creditor filed a complaint to determine the dischargeability of a debt owed by defendant debtor. The creditor brought this suit pursuant to the statutory exception to discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cote v. Catherman (In re Catherman). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member