Stambaugh v. Stambaugh (In re Stambaugh)

Ruling: 
Proceeding for exception from discharge under § 523(a)(3) dismissed for failure to state a claim where creditor had not stated a plausible claim under § 523(a)(2), (4), or (6).
Issue: 
Did creditor sufficiently establish grounds for nondischargeability under § 523(a)(2), (4), or (6) to be entitled to a discharge of unlisted intentional tort debt under § 523(a)(3)?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stambaugh v. Stambaugh (In re Stambaugh). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 14,2015, LexisNexis #0615-053