Schatz v. Chase Home Fin. (In re Schatz)

Ruling: 
Statement creditor sent to debtor that was specifically labeled "for compliance and/or informational purposes" did not violate stay.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiffs, a Chapter 13 debtor and his wife, filed an adversary proceeding against defendant creditor for violation of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(k) and for violations of federal and state consumer protection statutes. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schatz v. Chase Home Fin. (In re Schatz). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 25,2011, LexisNexis #0811-111