In re Pfeiler

Court rejected "snapshot" income analysis in holding that debtors were "above median" and required to submit plan with term of five years.
Procedural posture: 
The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 and submitted a proposed first plan and an amended plan. A chapter 13 trustee filed objections to confirmation of the first plan and the amended plan because the debtors did not propose a 60-month plan.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pfeiler. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 12,2008, LexisNexis #1008-127