Hukill v. Johns (In re Johns)

Debtor's failure to list assets of nominal value or alleged interest in spouse's bank account were not grounds for denial of discharge.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff creditor sued defendant debtor for a determination that her liability on an Oklahoma federal court default judgment was not dischargeable per 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6) and /or that debtor was properly denied a discharge per 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4). One issue was whether debtor acted improperly in failing to reflect on her schedules an alleged interest in a bank account owned by her husband that was "payable on death" (POD) to debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hukill v. Johns (In re Johns). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 08,2013, LexisNexis #0313-058