Winter Leadership Conference | December 5-7 | Rancho Palos Verdes , CA Register Today View Schedule

In re Steele

Ruling: 
Plan could not be confirmed due to unnecessary expenses, separate treatment of student loan debt and mathematical errors.
Procedural posture: 
Debtors, a husband and wife, filed a petition under chapter 7 in December 2009 and converted their case to one under chapter 13 in March 2010. Debtors filed an amended plan for repaying their creditors under chapter 13, and a trustee who was appointed to administer the debtors' chapter 13 bankruptcy estate filed an objection to the plan.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Steele. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 18,2010, LexisNexis #1210-126