In re Donald

Reaffirmation agreement was approved since it was in best interest of debtors and was required for debtors to retain car.
Procedural posture: 
At a discharge hearing pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 524(d), the court had to consider whether to approve a reaffirmation agreement between the chapter 7 debtors and a secured creditor under section 524(c)(6)(A) as being in the best interest of the debtors. The debtors argued that they could retain their car by making their payments even if the court disapproved the reaffirmation agreement, thereby making it unenforceable.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Donald. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member