In re Davis

Plan could be confirmed despite noncompliant treatment of three claims where creditors did not object.
Procedural posture: 
The chapter 13 trustee filed an objection to confirmation of the debtor's plan, asserting that the treatment of the claims of three secured judgment creditors under the proposed plan did not comply with the requirements imposed by 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a)(5)(B). The debtor argued that, because none of those creditors had objected to the proposed plan, 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a)(5)(A) was satisfied and § 1325(a)(5)(B) need not be considered.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Davis. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 12,2008, LexisNexis #0109-024