Swift Fin. Corp. v. Matera (In re Matera)

Representations in debtor's oral responses into creditor lender's computer database did not constitute a "written statement" and were not grounds for nondischargeability.
Procedural posture: 
Defendant debtor filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law in plaintiff creditor's action, which alleged that debt owed to it by the debtor was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(B).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Swift Fin. Corp. v. Matera (In re Matera). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 08,2010, LexisNexis #0111-123