Gomez v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re Gomez)

Reaffirmation agreement was valid despite failure to separate fees and costs or provide repayment schedule.
Procedural posture: 
Plaintiff bankruptcy debtors brought an adversary proceeding against creditor seeking a declaration that an agreement whereby the debtors reaffirmed their debt to the creditor secured by the debtors' home was null and void based on lack of compliance with the statutory requirements of 11 U.S.C.S. § 524.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gomez v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re Gomez). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 24,2012, LexisNexis #0712-023