Chrysler Group LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales Inc.

Customary and usual letters of intent were proper remedy for auto dealers whose franchise agreements, terminated during Chrysler's bankruptcy, were reinstated.
What is the appropriate remedy when former Chrysler auto dealerships seeking continuation or reinstatement of franchise agreements that had been terminated by Chrysler during its bankruptcy prevail in their statutorily-provided arbitrations under section 747 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chrysler Group LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 16,2015, LexisNexis #0215-042