In re Pak

Ruling: 
Confirmation denied due to debtor's failure to commit all projected disposable income to plan.
Procedural posture: 
A debtor sought confirmation of his amended chapter 13 plan, but the trustee and an unsecured creditor objected to the confirmation. The debtor contended that the plan should be confirmed because the payments constituted more than his "projected disposable income" under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pak. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member