Caldwell v. Dewoskin

Court barred from considering alleged stay violations by Rooker-Feldman doctrine due to state court's prior orders.
Could bankruptcy court consider whether the automatic stay applied to creditors' attempts to enforce the debtor's obligations in the state court's previous orders where the issue was thoroughly presented and argued before the state court and the state court decided that issue?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caldwell v. Dewoskin. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 27,2014, LexisNexis #0714-114