Cronk v. Oregon Credit & Collections Bureau Inc. (In re Cronk)

Ruling: 
Debtor could not avoid garnishment that was never presented and others that didn't meet threshold.
Issue: 
Did debtor meet the threshold amount necessary to allege that wage garnishments were preferential transfers?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cronk v. Oregon Credit & Collections Bureau Inc. (In re Cronk). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 25,2015, LexisNexis #1015-130