Kim v. Sun (In re Sun)

Ruling: 
Debt was nondischargeable due to debtors' false representations that caused creditors to invest funds.
Issue: 
Was claim for funds invested with debtor nondischargeable due to debtor's misrepresentations?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kim v. Sun (In re Sun). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 12,2014, LexisNexis #1014-014