DeSteph v. Connecticut Dept of Banking (In re DeSteph)

Ruling: 
State action to enforce securities laws fell within regulatory exception to automatic stay.
Procedural posture: 
Chapter 13 debtor filed an adversary proceeding against defendants, the State of Connecticut Department of Banking, the Commissioner, and a staff member (the State), for the State's alleged violation of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 and for violation of N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 358-C. The State filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(b).
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of DeSteph v. Connecticut Dept of Banking (In re DeSteph). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 02,2009, LexisNexis #0110-075