Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge morgan

In re Dimas LLC

Ruling
Compensation denied for services described in insufficient detail and services that did not benefit estate.
Procedural posture

The special counsel for a chapter 11 debtor filed an application, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330, for a final allowance of compensation and expense reimbursement.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dimas LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 29, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-086

In re Elliott-Cook

Ruling
Stay continued in debtor's second chapter 13 case due to sufficient evidence to overcome presumption of bad faith.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 debtor filed an uncontested motion for continuation of the automatic stay as to all creditors, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Elliott-Cook Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 20, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-076

In re Resto-Perez

Ruling
Automatic stay continued where debtors'second chapter 13 case was filed in good faith, met payment requirements and circumstances had changed in debtors'favor.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 debtors filed a motion for continuation of the automatic stay, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Resto-Perez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 20, 2006 , LexisNexis #0307-005

In re White

Ruling
Two judicial liens were avoided since the court calculated the debtor's interest in joint property as the debtor's partial interest rather than as the value of the entire property and since the amount of the impairment of the debtor's exemption exceeded t
Procedural posture

Debtor moved to avoid liens pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523. The issue before the court was one of statutory construction of 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(2)(A). More specifically, the question was whether the language "the debtor's interest in the property" required that computations with respect to jointly owned property be based upon only the debtor's share rather than the value of the entire property.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re White Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 23, 2005 , LexisNexis #0306-050