Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge

Buckley v. Bartenwerfer (In Bartenwerfer)

Ruling
Debt to creditor purchaser was nondischargeable due to debtors' knowing nondisclosure of leaks, status of permits, window problems, and a missing fire escape.
Issue(s)
Whether debtors fraudulently omitted disclosing material defects plaguing real property sold to creditor so as to make related debt nondischargeable?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Buckley v. Bartenwerfer (In Bartenwerfer) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 01, 2016 , LexisNexis #0416-120